Aristotelis Thanos vs Christian Sigsgaard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Aug at 10:45 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Thanos vs C. Sigsgaard

GRE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Thanos 1 - 0 Sigsgaard
They have played 3 sets in total, with Aristotelis Thanos winning 2 and Christian Sigsgaard winning 1. The last match between Aristotelis Thanos and Christian Sigsgaard was at the M25 Gentofte, 01-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Aristotelis Thanos getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Thanos | 1 |
Sigsgaard | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Gentofte(08-01-25)
A. Thanos vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
63.35% (140-81) | Career Total W/L | 63.78% (125-71) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
3 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Thanos vs C. Sigsgaard Match Preview:
- Questions arise about second serve efficiency: Which player has superior performance? Sigsgaard has shown better second serve success, winning 44.55% of points compared to Thanos's 40.57%.
- How do players fare in return games? Despite Sigsgaard trailing on second serve return points with 40.98%, Thanos excels at 51.12%, indicating stronger return capability.
- First serve return stats reveal Thanos slightly leads Sigsgaard, with 30.84% compared to 29.56%.
- Under pressure breakdown finds Thanos saving 49.52% of break points, marginally outperforming Sigsgaard at 48.98%.
- Performance overview from the past year has Thanos boasting a higher win rate of 75.56%, while Sigsgaard holds a 72.5% win rate.
- On indoor hard courts, Thanos holds a slight advantage with a career win rate of 71%, compared to Sigsgaard's 66%.
- Both players have shown dominance in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Thanos winning 78.38% and Sigsgaard 76.47% of matches.
- Considering opponent quality, Sigsgaard has faced players with an average rank of 398.7, higher than Thanos's competition average of 471.18.
- Deciding set performances favor Thanos, who has won 73% compared to Sigsgaard's 67% success rate.
- Who converts their break point chances better? Thanos shows a more robust conversion rate at 37.11%, surpassing Sigsgaard's 30.53%.
Editorial Prediction (August 1, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze these players' stats, numerous factors come into play for predicting the likely victor of this match.
Sigsgaard demonstrates strength in specific areas, such as second serve prowess, yet is surpassed by Thanos in returning and break point conversion.
Thanos exhibits strong return game capabilities and efficiency under pressure, making him formidable in tight match situations.
The higher win percentage over the past year and success in deciding sets also solidify Thanos's status as a solid contender.
Given these evaluations, Thanos is the likely winner of this upcoming match, based on recent trends and performance statistics.
Aristotelis Thanos vs Christian Sigsgaard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Thanos vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
15 | Games Won | 9 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:38:40 | Average Match Time | 1:38:40 |
71% (53/75) | 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) |
74% (39/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (29/46) |
41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
43% (29/68) | Return Points Win % | 36% (27/75) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Thanos Recent Matches Played
C. Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played

A. Thanos vs C. Sigsgaard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63.35% (140/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.78% (125/71) |
61.05% (301/192) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.98% (279/164) |
55.39% (2540/2046) | Games Win/Loss | 55.31% (2302/1860) |
58.04% (65/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.53% (54/31) |
68.42% (65/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.30% (38/23) |
71.43% (10/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.35% (33/16) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
470 | Aces Total | 443 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
669 | Total Double Faults | 312 |
1:12:53 | Average Match Time | 1:15:33 |
358.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.54 |
59% (5868/9869) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6589/9980) |
67% (3959/5868) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4432/6589) |
46% (1833/4001) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1793/3391) |
48% (517/1066) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (502/1047) |
43% (4178/9687) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4304/10205) |
66.67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
50.00% (9/9) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
64.47% (127/70) | Futures W/L | 65.93% (120/62) |
64% (137/214) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (120/189) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
56% (27/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
62% (32/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (19/48) |
92% (129/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (130/112) |
8% (129/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (130/18) |
24% (92/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (66/13) |